Assigned to COM & GOV                                                                                                          FOR COMMITTEE

 

 


 

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Phoenix, Arizona

 

FACT SHEET FOR H.B. 2500

 

contractors; payments

 

Purpose

 

Eliminates the ability of an owner to hold a reasonable amount of an unpaid balance of a construction contract for retention.

 

Background

 

Current law stipulates that any billing or estimate of construction work performed and the materials supplied are deemed approved and certified 14 days after the owner receives the billing or estimate unless, during that 14 days, the owner issues a written statement detailing those items not approved or certified.  In the event that there are problems that can be documented, an owner may withhold an amount that is sufficient to pay for the direct expenses the owner reasonably expects to incur to correct any of the nonapproved items.  An owner can withhold payments for defective construction work or materials, disputed work or materials, failure to comply with other provisions of the contract, third party claims filed or reasonable evidence that the contract cannot be completed for the unpaid balance of the contract.  In addition to these reasons, an owner can withhold a percentage of the total contract amount for retainage without specifying reasons for withholding the amount or the period for which it will be held. 

 

Contractors and subcontractors have expressed concern that owners often use retained funds to finance other jobs at the contractor's or subcontractor's expense when the contract has been completed satisfactorily.  H.B. 2500 eliminates an owner's ability to hold funds for a retention.

 

There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state general fund associated with this measure.

 

Provisions

 

1.      Eliminates an owner's ability to withhold from payment a reasonable amount for retention.

 

2.      Makes technical and conforming changes.

 

3.      Provides for a general effective date.

 


House Action

 

RGO                3/26/02            DP       8-0-0-2

3rd Read           4/9/02                          26-29-5-0

3rd Read #2      4/10/02                        31-24-5-0

            (On reconsideration)

 

 

Prepared by Senate Staff

April 15, 2002