House of Representatives

HB 2339

community health centers; confidential information

Sponsors: Voss, Miranda, Senator Richardson, et al

 

DP

Committee on Health

DP

Committee on Retirement and Government Operations

DP

Caucus and COW

DP

Third Read

 

X

As Transmitted To The Governor

 

HB 2339 extends existing health care standards of confidentiality and immunity relating to medical practice peer reviews to Community Health Centers.

 

History

 

Community Health Centers (CHCs) are private, not-for-profit, consumer-directed health care corporations which provide comprehensive primary and preventive care to medically undeserved and uninsured people. CHCs are commonly referred to as Federally Qualified Health Centers because they meet federal standards related to quality of care and services.   According to the National Association of Community Health Centers, there are more than 1,029 community-based health centers in operation today that more than 11 million patients annually. In Arizona there are 75 community health center sites that served 160,948 patients in 2000.

 

The peer review process is commonly used in hospitals and outpatient surgical centers as tool for evaluating the quality of health care services, reducing costs and providing protection from liability.  Typically, peer review consists of a panel of health care professionals that evaluate all aspects of health care delivery by a physician or other health care providers. 

 

Despite having a similar peer review process as hospitals and outpatient surgical centers, CHCs do not have the same confidentiality and immunity standards.  In addition, CHCs must have these standards to satisfy federal accreditation standards.

 

HB 2339 extends confidentiality and immunity practices to CHCs to provide the safeguards to CHC peer reviews already in place for other health care entities.

 

 

Provisions

 

·          Extends confidentiality of findings and records resulting from peer reviews to CHCs.

·          Extends immunity to personnel and entities of CHCs for consequent actions resulting from review committee’s findings.

·          Stipulates that when a health care professional is sanctioned in a CHC peer review and challenges the decision, the prevailing party of that challenge is entitled to only the taxable costs of the proceedings.

·          Makes technical changes.

·           

·           

·          ---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------

·          45th Legislature                 

·          Second Regular Session      2          May 29, 2002

·           

·          ---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------