House of Representatives

HB 2283

municipal prosecution; diversion

Sponsors: Representative Marsh

 

DPA

Committee on Judiciary

DPA

Caucus and COW

X

Third Read

 

 

As Passed the House

 

HB 2283 allows the chief prosecutor of a city or town to establish a diversion program to provide for the dismissal of criminal complaints if the program’s requirements are successfully completed.

 

Current Status

HB 2283 was amended in the Judiciary Committee to remove the prohibition on allowing diversion for a defendant who has previously participated in the diversion program for the same offense and to remove the provision that requires the court to approve a diversion plea agreement.  The Judiciary Committee amendment was adopted in the Committee of the Whole.

 

History

Diversion programs that require criminal offenders to successfully complete counseling programs in order to have the charges against them dismissed are already in existence. Currently, a county attorney has statutory authority to divert prosecution in favor of a diversion program; however, municipal prosecutors do not have that statutory authority.

 

Provisions

§         Allows a chief prosecuting officer of a city or town to establish a diversion program that allows for the dismissal of a criminal complaint upon successful completion of the program’s requirements.

§         Stipulates that diversion programs shall not be available for persons accused of a crime involving the discharge, use or threatening exhibition of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument.

§         Stipulates that the prosecutor has sole discretion to decide whether to divert prosecution before a guilty plea or trial.

§         Makes a technical correction.

 
Amendments

HB 2283 was amended in the Judiciary Committee as follows:

§         Removes the prohibition on allowing diversion for a defendant who has previously participated in the diversion program for the same offense.

§         Removes the provision that requires the court to approve a diversion plea agreement.

§         Makes a technical correction.

The Judiciary Committee amendment was adopted in the Committee of the Whole.

 

 

 

 

---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------

45th Legislature                    

Second Regular Session        2          April 6, 2002

 

---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------