House of Representatives

HB 2259

children in foster care

(now:  parenting plans; modifications) 

Sponsor: Representative Johnson

 

DPA

 S/E

Committee on Human Services

DPA

Caucus and COW

DPA

Third Read

 

F

As Passed the House

 

HB 2259 as amended requires the court to determine child custody and adopt a written parenting plan, including provisions on parental responsibility, physical residence of the child, and procedures for resolving disputes. 

 

Provisions

·          Requires the court, in a divorce proceeding, to determine custody and adopt a parenting plan or if the parents cannot agree on one plan, permits each parent to submit separate plans.

·          Stipulates the parenting plan must include the following:

Ø      Each parent’s responsibility for the child’s personal care and decision making areas of education, health care, and religious training.

Ø      Schedule of child’s physical residence, including vacations and holidays and provisions for communication between each parent and the child.

Ø      Procedure for parents to resolve disputes about proposed changes.

Ø      Procedure for periodic review of the plan by the parents.

·          Clarifies the court shall adopt the plan originally or modified according to the best interests of the child and prohibits the court from preferring one parent to another because of gender.

·          Outlines plan factors similar to those in existing child custody statute in which the court shall consider with the addition of the following provisions:

Ø      Parental discouragement for contact with the other parent is contrary to the best interests of the child.

Ø      Which parent is more likely to promote a civil and accommodating relationship with the other parent to protect the child from parental conflict effects.

Ø      Which parent is likely to refrain from speaking derogatorily about the other parent.

Ø      Willingness and ability of each parent to provide for the child’s care.

·          Establishes rebuttable presumptions for deciding the best interests of a child on contested provisions of a plan.

·          Contains a delayed effective date of December 31, 2002

·          Makes technical and conforming changes.

 

HB 2259 failed to pass Third Read.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------

45th Legislature                   

Second Regular Session       2          April 6, 2002

 

---------- DOCUMENT FOOTER ---------