COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B. 2259
(Reference to printed bill)
Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert:
"Section 1. Section 25-403, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
25-403. Parenting plans; best interests of child; domestic violence; modification of decree; fees
A. The court
shall determine custody, either originally or on petition for modification, in
accordance with the best interests of the child. The court shall
consider all relevant factors, including:
1. The wishes
of the child's parent or parents as to custody.
2. The wishes
of the child as to the custodian.
3. The interaction
and interrelationship of the child with the child's parent or parents, the
child's siblings and any other person who may significantly affect the child's
best interest.
4. The child's
adjustment to home, school and community.
5. The mental
and physical health of all individuals involved.
6. Which
parent is more likely to allow the child frequent and meaningful continuing
contact with the other parent.
7. If one
parent, both parents or neither parent has provided primary care of the child.
8. The nature
and extent of coercion or duress used by a parent in obtaining an agreement
regarding custody.
9. Whether a
parent has complied with chapter 3, article 5 of this title.
B. In awarding
child custody, the court may order sole custody or joint custody. This
section does not create a presumption in favor of one custody arrangement over
another. The court in determining custody shall not prefer a parent
as custodian because of that parent's sex.
C. The court
may issue an order for joint custody of a child if both parents agree and
submit a written parenting plan and the court finds such an order is in the
best interests of the child. The court may order joint legal custody
without ordering joint physical custody.
D. The court
may issue an order for joint custody over the objection of one of the parents
if the court makes specific written findings of why the order is in the child's
best interests. In determining whether joint custody is in the
child's best interests, the court shall consider the factors prescribed in
subsection A of this section and all of the following:
1. The
agreement or lack of an agreement by the parents regarding joint custody.
2. A parent's
lack of agreement is unreasonable or is influenced by an issue not related to
the best interests of the child.
3. The past,
present and future abilities of the parents to cooperate in decision‑making
about the child to the extent required by the order of joint custody.
4. Whether the
joint custody arrangement is logistically possible.
E. Notwithstanding
subsection N of this section, joint custody shall not be awarded if the court
makes a finding of the existence of significant domestic violence pursuant to
section 13‑3601 or if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence
that there has been a significant history of domestic violence.
F. Before an
award is made granting joint custody, the parents shall submit a proposed
parenting plan that includes at least the following:
1. Each
parent's rights and responsibilities for the personal care of the child and for
decisions in areas such as education, health care and religious training.
2. A schedule
of the physical residence of the child, including holidays and school
vacations.
3. A procedure
by which proposed changes, disputes and alleged breaches may be mediated or
resolved, which may include the use of conciliation services or private
counseling.
4. A procedure
for periodic review of the plan's terms by the parents.
5. A statement
that the parties understand that joint custody does not necessarily mean equal
parenting time.
G. If the
parents are unable to agree on any element to be included in a parenting plan,
the court shall determine that element. The court may determine
other factors that are necessary to promote and protect the emotional and
physical health of the child.
A. The court
shall adopt a written parenting plan, which constitutes a child custody order,
for each proceeding brought pursuant to this article.
B. The
parents may submit a parenting plan on which both parents are in
agreement. If the parents are unable to
agree on the parenting plan or any element of a PARENTING plan, each parent may
submit a separate PARENTING plan or elements of a parenting plan for the court's
consideration. A parenting plan must include at least the following elements:
1. Each
parent's responsibilities for the child's personal care and for decision making
in areas such as education, health care and religious training.
2. A
schedule of the child's physical residence, including holidays and school
vacations.
3. Appropriate
provisions for contact between the child and each parent.
4. A
procedure by which the parents should attempt to resolve disputes, alleged
breaches and disagreements about proposed changes outside of court. These procedures may include, for example
the use of conciliation services, mediation or private counseling.
5. A
procedure for periodic review of the plan by the parents. The EXISTING parenting plan remains in
effect UNTIL such time as the court grants a modification. the court may consider the changing
developmental needs of a child as a sufficient substantial and continuing
change of circumstances.
c. the court shall adopt the terms
of the parenting plan either originally or on petition for modification according
to the child's best interests. In
adopting the parenting plan, the court shall not prefer a parent because of
that parent's sex. The court shall
consider all relevant factors, including:
1. the
wishes of the child's parent or parents.
2. The child's
wishes.
3. The
interaction and interrelationship of the child with the child's parent or
parents, the child's siblings and any other person who may significantly affect
the child's best interests.
4. The
child's adjustment to home, school and community.
5. The
mental and physical health of all persons involved.
6. Which
parent is more likely to encourage the child's frequent and meaningful
continuing contact with the other parent. Absent good cause, the court shall
consider interfering with or discouraging the child's frequent and meaningful
contact with the other parent as contrary to the child's best interests.
7. Which
parent is more likely to promote a civil and accommodating RELATIONSHIP with
the other parent to protect the child from the harmful effects of parental
conflict.
8. WHICH PARENT’S BEHAVIOR WITH REGARD TO THE OTHER PARENT,
SUCH AS REFRAINING FROM MAKING DEROGATORY STATEMENTS TO THE CHILD ABOUT THE
OTHER PARENT, IS MORE LIKELY TO PROMOTE A HEALTHY ADJUSTMENT IN THE CHILD.
9. THE WILLINGNESS AND ABILITY OF EACH PARENT TO PROVIDE OR TO
LEARN TO PROVIDE FOR THE CHILD’S CARE.
10. The
nature and extent of COERCION or duress used by a parent in obtaining an
AGREEMENT regarding custody.
11. Whether
a parent has COMPliED with chapter 3, article 5 of this title.
D. in
determining or choosing between contested provisions of a parenting plan, there
is a rebuttable presumption that it is in the child's best interests that:
1. each
parent make decisions regarding the day-to-day care and control of the child
while the child is residing with that parent.
2. The
parents share decision making authority for major life DECISIONS involving the
child.
3. The
parents RESOLVE disputes pursuant to the procedure required pursuant to
subsection B, paragraph 4 of this section.
4. The child
is entitled to contact and parenting time with each parent at least comparable
to that prescribed by the parenting models published by the Arizona supreme
court.
H. e. Unless otherwise provided by court order or law, on reasonable request both parents are entitled to have equal access to documents and other information concerning the child's education and physical, mental, moral and emotional health including medical, school, police, court and other records directly from the custodian of the records or from the other parent. A person who does not comply with a reasonable request shall reimburse the requesting parent for court costs and attorney fees incurred by that parent to force compliance with this subsection. A parent who attempts to restrict the release of documents or information by the custodian under this subsection without a prior court order is subject to appropriate legal sanctions.
I. f. The court may specify one parent as the primary caretaker of the child and one home as the primary home of the child for the purposes of defining eligibility for public assistance. This finding does not diminish the rights of either parent and does not create a presumption for or against either parent in a proceeding for the modification of a custody order.
J. g. In a contested custody case, the court shall make specific findings on the record about all relevant factors and the reasons for which the decision is in the best interests of the child.
K. h. If the court determines that a parent has been convicted of any drug offense under title 13, chapter 34 or any violation of section 28‑1381, 28‑1382 or 28‑1383 within twelve months before the petition or the request for custody is filed, there is a rebuttable presumption that sole or joint custody by that parent is not in the child's best interests. In making this determination the court shall state its:
1. Findings of fact that support its determination that the parent was convicted of the offense.
2. Findings that the custody or parenting time arrangement ordered by the court appropriately protects the child.
L. i. To determine if the person has rebutted the presumption established under subsection K H of this section, at a minimum the court shall consider the following evidence:
1. The absence of any conviction of any other drug offense during the previous five years.
2. Results of random drug testing for a six month period that indicate that the person is not using drugs as proscribed by title 13, chapter 34.
M. j. The court shall consider evidence of domestic violence as being contrary to the best interests of the child. The court shall consider the safety and well‑being of the child and of the victim of the act of domestic violence to be of primary importance. The court shall consider a perpetrator's history of causing or threatening to cause physical harm to another person.
N. k. If the court determines that a parent who is seeking custody has committed an act of domestic violence against the other parent, there is a rebuttable presumption that an award of custody to the parent who committed the act of domestic violence is contrary to the child's best interests. This presumption does not apply if both parents have committed an act of domestic violence. For the purposes of this subsection, a person commits an act of domestic violence if that person does any of the following:
1. Intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes or attempts to cause sexual assault or serious physical injury.
2. Places a person in reasonable apprehension of imminent serious physical injury to any person.
3. Engages in a pattern of behavior for which a court may issue an ex parte order to protect the other parent who is seeking child custody or to protect the child and the child's siblings.
O. l. To determine if the parent has rebutted the presumption the court shall consider all of the following:
1. Whether the parent has demonstrated that being awarded sole custody or joint physical or legal custody is in the child's best interests.
2. Whether the parent has successfully completed a batterer's prevention program.
3. Whether the parent has successfully completed a program of alcohol or drug abuse counseling, if the court determines that counseling is appropriate.
4. Whether the parent has successfully completed a parenting class, if the court determines that a parenting class is appropriate.
5. If the parent is on probation, parole or community supervision, whether the parent is restrained by a protective order that was granted after a hearing.
6. Whether the parent has committed any further acts of domestic violence.
P. m. If the court finds that a parent has committed an act of domestic violence, that parent has the burden of proving to the court's satisfaction that parenting time will not endanger the child or significantly impair the child's emotional development. If the parent meets this burden to the court's satisfaction, the court shall place conditions on parenting time that best protect the child and the other parent from further harm. The court may:
1. Order that an exchange of the child must occur in a protected setting as specified by the court.
2. Order that an agency specified by the court must supervise parenting time. If the court allows a family or household member to supervise parenting time, the court shall establish conditions that this person must follow during parenting time.
3. Order the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to attend and complete, to the court's satisfaction, a program of intervention for perpetrators of domestic violence and any other counseling the court orders.
4. Order the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to abstain from possessing or consuming alcohol or controlled substances during parenting time and for twenty‑four hours before parenting time.
5. Order the parent who committed the act of domestic violence to pay a fee to the court to defray the costs of supervised parenting time.
6. Prohibit overnight parenting time.
7. Require a bond from the parent who committed the act of domestic violence for the child's safe return.
8. Order that the address of the child and the other parent remain confidential.
9. Impose any other condition that the court determines is necessary to protect the child, the other parent and any other family or household member.
Q. n. In determining whether the absence or relocation of a parent shall be weighed against that parent in determining custody or parenting time, the court may consider whether the absence or relocation was caused by an act of domestic violence by the other parent.
R. o. The court shall not order joint counseling between a victim and the perpetrator of domestic violence. The court may refer a victim to appropriate counseling and shall provide a victim with written information about available community resources related to domestic violence.
S. p. To determine if a person has committed an act of domestic violence, the court, subject to the rules of evidence, shall consider all relevant factors including the following:
1. Findings from another court of competent jurisdiction.
2. Police reports.
3. Medical reports.
4. Child protective services records.
5. Domestic violence shelter records.
6. School records.
7. Witness testimony.
T. q. A person shall not make a motion to modify a custody decree earlier than one year after its date, unless the court permits it to be made on the basis of affidavits that there is reason to believe the child's present environment may seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health. At any time after a joint custody order is entered, a parent may petition the court for modification of the order on the basis of evidence that domestic violence pursuant to section 13‑1201 or 13‑1204, spousal abuse or child abuse occurred since the entry of the joint custody order. Six months after a joint custody order is entered, a parent may petition the court for modification of the order based on the failure of the other parent to comply with the provisions of the order. A motion or petition to modify a custody order shall meet the requirements of sections 25‑408 and 25‑411.
U. r. The court shall assess attorney fees and costs against a party seeking modification if the court finds that the modification action is vexatious and constitutes harassment.
V. s. In a proceeding regarding sole custody or joint custody, either party may request attorney fees, costs and expert witness fees to enable the party with insufficient resources to obtain adequate legal representation and to prepare evidence for the hearing. If the court finds there is a financial disparity between the parties, the court may order payment of reasonable fees, expenses and costs to allow adequate preparation.
W. t. For any custody order entered under this section, the court shall determine an amount of child support in accordance with section 25‑320 and guidelines established pursuant to that section. An award of joint custody does not diminish the responsibility of either parent to provide for the support of the child.
X. u. The court shall not request or order the services of the division of children and family services in the department of economic security unless it believes that a child may be the victim of child abuse or neglect as defined in section 8‑201.
Sec. 2. Conforming legislation
The legislative council staff shall prepare proposed legislation conforming the Arizona Revised Statutes to the provisions of this act for consideration in the forty-sixth legislature, first regular session.
Sec. 3. Effective
date
Section 25-403, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act is effective from and after December 31, 2002."