Phoenix, Arizona
VETOED
FINAL
REVISED
regulatory reform
Purpose
Modifies the statutes regarding agency regulatory approval process to require annual agency regulatory agendas and the referencing of studies underlying a rulemaking. Establishes a regulatory reform and enforcement study committee.
Background
In the late 1990s, a series of legislative efforts resulted in the reform of state regulatory procedures, including the state rulemaking procedures and establishment of a comprehensive bill of rights for persons subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the state. These efforts to strengthen the administrative procedures of state agencies, generally referred to as regulatory reform, continue based on ongoing evaluation of the results of regulatory reform on the practices of state agencies.
H.B. 2537 requires agencies to prepare and make available to the public its regulatory agenda for the following year and to reference in the preamble any study it has prepared and reviewed and did not rely on in its evaluation of or justification for a rule. H.B. 2537 also establishes a regulatory reform and enforcement study committee to conduct hearings and inquire into various regulatory issues.
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the state general fund associated with this bill.
In her veto message the Governor stated that the bill was vetoed “to protect the integrity of the legislative process.” She noted that a mistake occurred in the Senate, for which a workable solution could not be found to correct the mistake. She also stated that if there is a question of this nature it is best to set this legislation aside and revisit it again next session. The Governor concluded that there is no compromise when it comes to maintaining the integrity of the process.
Provisions
Amendments Adopted by Commerce
Committee
Increases, from 3 to 4, the Senate members on the study committee.*
Amendments Adopted by
Committee of the Whole
Removes the number of new FTE's estimated to be necessary to implement each rule from the list of items required to be included in the annual regulatory agenda.
House Action
Senate Action
RGO 3/9/01 DPA 8-0-0-2 COM 4/4/01 DPA 6-0-0-0
3rd Read 3/19/01 50-6-4-0 3rd Read 4/19/01 25-5-0-0
Final Read 4/30/01 40-18-2-0
* An engrossing error occurred on the Commerce Committee amendment. A proposed amendment that added the attorney general (AG) or the AG's designee to the study committee was inadvertently included in the engrossed committee amendment. This provision is currently incorporated in the bill.
Vetoed by the Governor 5/4/01
Prepared by Senate Staff
May 15, 2001