Assigned to GOV                                                                                                                                   AS ENACTED

 

 


 

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Phoenix, Arizona

 

FINAL REVISED

FACT SHEET FOR S.B. 1246

 

intergovernmental agreements; procedure

                       (NOW:  expenditure limitations; disproportionate share funding)

                                                                                                                                                           

Purpose

 

Maintains for FY 2001-2002 and FY 2002-2003 the $100 penalty for a municipality, county or community college district violating its constitutional expenditure limits if the expenditures of a city, town, county or community college district do not exceed the expenditure limitation for FY 1999-2000 multiplied by the percentage change in population and multiplied by specific inflation factors for each fiscal year.

 

 Requires county expenditure limits to be adjusted beginning with FY 2001-2002 as a result of the elimination of the transfer of funding for the federal disproportionate share health (DSH) services from the counties to the state and federal governments beginning with FY 2001-2002.

 

Background

 

Article 9, Sections 20 and 21 of the Arizona Constitution require the Economic Estimates Commission to determine each year the expenditure limitation for the following fiscal year for each county, community college district, city and town.  The limitation is calculated based upon the amount of FY 1979-1980 actual payments of local revenues, referred to as the “base limit.”  Each year, the base limits for local jurisdictions are adjusted for population and inflation to reach the expenditure limitations.  The inflation index used by the Commission is the GDP price deflator.  Every four years, the GDP price deflator is adjusted by the U.S. Department of Commerce.  According to the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, the 2000 GDP adjustment had the effect of reducing the allowable expenditures for municipalities and counties to an amount less than the previous year. As a result, last year, H.B. 2563 suspended the penalty for exceeding the expenditure limit for one year in order to allow for continued study and review.  S.B. 1246 extends the suspension of the penalty for two more years with the intent to allow more time to study options.

 

Article 9, Section 20 also requires the Commission to adjust the base limit to reflect “subsequent transfers of all or any part of the cost of providing a governmental function, in a manner prescribed by law.”  In FY 1991-1992, Arizona began participation in the DSH payments program, distributing federal funds to county hospitals that serve a disproportionate share of Medicaid or low income patients.  Through this participation, a portion of the cost of providing health care services to the public is transferred from the counties to the federal government.  That same year, the Legislature directed the Economic Estimates Commission to adjust, for allocations of DSH payments, the base limit used in calculating the county expenditure limitation.  This direction has continued annually through the current fiscal year.  Traditionally, the annual legislation directs the Commission to decrease the base limit for DSH payments allocated in a single fiscal year, and to increase the base limit by the same amount in the next fiscal year, bringing the base limit back to the original level. Currently, only Maricopa and Pima counties’ expenditure limitations are adjusted for DSH allocations. 

 

            During the 1999 legislative session, legislation was once again enacted (Laws 1999, Chapter 176) directing the Economic Estimates Commission to adjust the base limit for allocations of DSH payments. For the first time, direction was given to the Commission to adjust the base limit for a two-year period.  This was done to conform to biennial budgeting.  This legislation continues the adjustment for FY 2000-2001, and ends the adjustment beginning with FY 2001-2002 as a result of the elimination of DSH payments to Pima and Maricopa counties' hospitals.

 

            There is no fiscal impact to the state general fund associated with this legislation.

 

Provisions

 

City, Town, County and Community College District

 

1.      Provides that the Legislature finds that the reduction in the GDP price deflator index currently used to compute city, town, county or community college district expenditure limitations has resulted in limitations that do not accurately reflect the effect of inflation on the state’s political subdivisions budgets.

 

2.      Establishes a $100 penalty in FY 2001-2002 and FY 2002-2003 for violating expenditure limits if the expenditures of a city, town, county or community college district do not exceed the expenditure limitation for FY 1999-2000 multiplied by the percentage change in population and multiplied by a three percent inflation factor for each fiscal year.

 

3.      Provides method for computing percentage change in populations.

 

County

 

4.      Requires county expenditure limits to be adjusted beginning with FY 2001-2002 as a result of the elimination of the transfer of funding for DSH services from the counties to the state and federal governments beginning with FY 2001-2002.

 

5.      Requires the Economic Estimates Commission to increase the base limit of each county by the amount the base limit was decreased for FY 2000-2001 relating to county expenditure limitations in FY 2000-2001.

 

6.      Requires for FY 2000-2001 the Economic Estimates Commission to use:

 

a.       the base limit of $156,635,737 in adjusting Maricopa County's expenditure limitation for DSH payments.

b.      the base limit of $93,755,872 in adjusting Pima County's expenditure limitation for DSH payments.

7.      Provides for a general effective date.

 

Amendments Adopted by the House of Representatives

 

Adopted a strike everything amendment.

 

Senate Action                                                              House Action

 

Final Action      5/2/01              28-0-2-0                      PIRA        4/03/01       DPA/SE   8-0-0-2-0

                                                                                    3rd Read    4/11/01                        50-5-5-0

 

 

Signed by Governor 5/7/01

Chapter 362

 

 

Prepared by Senate Staff

May 25, 2001