Assigned to NRAE                                                                                                     FOR CAUCUS & FLOOR ACTION

 

 


 

ARIZONA STATE SENATE

Phoenix, Arizona

 

REVISED

FACT SHEET FOR S.C.M. 1001

 

arsenic levels in drinking water

 

Purpose

 

            Urges the U.S. Congress to delay final rulemaking by the Environmental Protection Agency on arsenic levels in drinking water. 

 

Background

 

            In 1975, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set the current standard of 50 parts per billion (ppb) of arsenic in drinking water based on a Public Health Service standard originally established in 1942.  After reviewing the 50 ppb standard, the National Academy of Sciences concluded in March 1999 that the current standard does not achieve the EPA’s goal of protecting public health and should be lowered as soon as possible.  As a result, on June 22, 2000, the EPA proposed a new drinking water standard of 5 ppb for arsenic and requested comment on options of 3 ppb, 10 ppb and 20 ppb.  According to the EPA, they evaluated over 6,500 pages of comments from 1,100 commenters who ranged from stakeholders, federal and state agencies, commercial businesses and Native American tribes. 

 

Under the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996, the EPA is required to issue a final rule on arsenic levels in drinking water by January 1, 2001.  Congress subsequently extended this date to June 22, 2001.  On January 17, 2001, the EPA proposed the new arsenic standard for drinking water to be set at 10 ppb.

 

            According to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), the western United States, and the desert Southwest in particular, have, as part of their geology and hydrogeology, naturally occurring arsenic at high levels.  ADEQ gives the example that the groundwater throughout much of Arizona ranges in levels of naturally occurring arsenic from nondetection to 200 ppb.  ADEQ states that the Verde River, a free flowing stream that supplies much of the water supply for the metropolitan Phoenix area, has naturally occurring arsenic levels ranging from 11 ppb to 17 ppb.  ADEQ contends that both Nevada and New Mexico have similar naturally occurring arsenic levels.  Furthermore, ADEQ has estimated that compliance costs associated with the 10 ppb level would be approximately $76 million per year, and that 30 percent of community water systems would be out of compliance with an imposed level of 10 ppb.

 

            The Arizona Chamber of Commerce is concerned with the validity of the scientific information on which the EPA is basing its arsenic levels in drinking water standards, and believes that the costs associated with EPA compliance could be considerable to consumers, particularly in small water systems. 

 

Provisions

 

1.      Urges the U.S. Congress to give the EPA more time to review information related to the arsenic rule making process so that the EPA can produce a rational, well-researched, cost effective standard that is in the best interests of the public.

 

2.      Requests that the Secretary of State of Arizona transmit copies of this memorial to the President of the U.S. Senate, the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, the congressional members of the State of Arizona and the Director of the EPA.

 

Amendments Adopted by Committee

 

1.      Changes the reference to the proposed arsenic standard from 5 ppb to 10 ppb in recognition of the EPA's proposal to set the standard at 10 ppb on January 17, 2001.

 

2.      Makes technical and conforming changes.

 

Senate Action

 

NRAE              2/22/01            DPA    7-1-0-0

 

 

Prepared by Senate Staff

February 27, 2001