Sponsors: Representatives Binder: Carruthers,
Foster, et al.
DPA
Committee on Counties &
Municipalities
X
Caucus and COW
As Passed the House
HB 2295 establishes a property information storage and
retrieval conversion and maintenance fund in each county.
Provisions
·Establishes a fund for property information storage and
retrieval conversion and maintenance (PISRCM) in each county.
·Requires the board of supervisors to administer and, in
cooperation with the county assessor, spend the fund monies in order to defray
the cost of converting the county’s property information storage and retrieval
system to micrographics or computer animation.
·Specifies that fund monies may only be used for the
purchase of hardware and software, employee training, system maintenance,
equipment maintenance agreement purchases and system updating for the county
recorder.
·Prohibits the use of fund monies for the expenses other
than for the support of the county’s automation system.
·Requires the county general fund to reimburse the
PISRCM fund for all improper and inconsistent expenditures as determined by the
auditor general.
·Allows the board of supervisors to collect a special
recording surcharge of up to four dollars for each instrument, paper or notice
filed with the county recorder, which will be deposited in the PISRCM fund.
·Requires the county recorder to submit to the board of
supervisors an annual amount of projected revenues to be raised for PISRCM
fund.
·Stipulates that the fund shall accumulate until
sufficient monies are available to pay for conversion costs.
HB 2295 was
amended in the Counties and Municipalities Committee as follows:
·Creates a delayed effective date of December 31, 2001.
·Specifies that the fund may be established in county’s
having a population of five hundred thousand persons or less.
·Changes the name of the fund to the county assessor’s
property information storage and retrieval conversion and maintenance fund.
·Stipulates that fund monies shall only be used to
purchase hardware and software, including a graphical information system and to
train employees.
·Clarifies that the board of supervisors must approve
the special assessment fee.
·Requires that any implementation resolution shall contain
the following:
Řa determination of the total amount of monies and
schedule of time required to implement the systems.
Řan estimate of the annual fees to be collected.
Řan automatic repeal of the authority to impose and
collect the assessment fees when enough monies have been collected to assess
the system or the original time schedule is completed.
·Allows the county recorder to collect all monies for
the fund.
·Establishes a delayed repeal date of December 31, 2006.